Putin is right about the West’s endless attempts to woo Kiev: Rejecting Ukraine’s history with Russia could destroy the country

Putin is correct concerning the West’s limitless makes an attempt to woo Kiev: Rejecting Ukraine’s historical past with Russia may destroy the nation

Post by


Russian President Vladimir Putin has penned an article arguing that Russians and Ukrainians, regardless of the variations between their two governments because the 2014 Maidan, are literally one individuals, with a shared historical past and tradition.

Unsurprisingly, the message of unity and remorse over present political disputes has been met with apoplexy, each amongst Kiev’s extra zealous anti-Russia campaigners and the West’s political and media lessons. For some, Putin’s phrases are even tantamount to a name for the annexation of Ukraine.

One individuals – rocky relations

The article, printed simply weeks in the past on the Kremlin’s web site, confronted a direct backlash. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, instantly got here out to reject Putin’s argument that Russians and Ukrainians are one individuals, and that there’s hope for higher relations due to these deep ties.

Nevertheless, inconveniently for Zelensky, it shortly emerged that in 2014 he had mentioned the identical factor. “We can’t be in opposition to the Russian individuals in any respect, as a result of we’re a single individuals,” the then-comedian and TV persona concluded in a newspaper article.

Worse nonetheless, the Kyiv Publish has since printed a brand new ballot suggesting that 41 % of Ukrainians agree with Putin’s argument that the 2 nations are actually one individuals. Nevertheless, there isn’t any suggestion that 41 % need to quit independence and statehood, and Putin made no such defence of the concept of absorbing Ukraine into Russia.

NATO has launched into an expansionist venture legitimized by the idea that Russia’s neighbours can solely stay sovereign beneath the safety of the US-led navy bloc. The counterargument put ahead by Putin is that changing Ukraine into an anti-Russian bulwark undermines its sovereignty.



Additionally on rt.com
Fashionable Ukraine is invention of Soviet-era, Putin claims, saying new nation was created ‘at expense’ of historic Russian lands


Trying to tear up centuries of widespread civilizational ties has made Ukraine ungovernable, riven with social divisions because the multicultural nation is instructed to activate its roots. This a lot is evident from the self-harm inflicted by Kiev’s ‘anti-terrorist operations’ in opposition to its personal individuals, the banning of Russian-language cultural merchandise, severing very important financial connectivity with Moscow, clamping down on the media, and the arrest of the primary opposition chief, Viktor Medvedchuk.

Putin argues it’s already troublesome to contemplate Ukraine a sovereign state, because the administration of its politics, financial system, civil society, and international coverage has largely been outsourced to the US.

“A serious geopolitical catastrophe of the century”

Ideological conformity compels NATO states to have a good time the collapse of the Soviet Union as merely a victory of liberal democracy over authoritarianism, which obscures the difficult legacy of what was left as an alternative. Any efforts by Moscow to deal with the issues stemming from new state borders reducing by the widespread civilizational and geopolitical area are opportunistically demonized and propagandized by Western powers as a nefarious Russian plot to revive the Soviet Union.

Putin famously referred to the collapse of the Soviet Union as “a significant geopolitical catastrophe of the century” in a speech to the Federal Meeting in 2005. The phrase is nearly obligatory to cite for Russophobic journalists, lecturers, and politicians who search proof for the conclusion that Putin longs for the restoration of the Soviet Union.

To achieve this conclusion, the quote is disadvantaged of all context. Putin spoke in size concerning the penalties of getting tens of thousands and thousands of Russians left exterior Russian territory. The Russian president defined how the collapse broke aside households, industries, beliefs, and establishments, and gave rise to terrorism, oligarchs, poverty, and socio-economic desperation. Thus, the collapse of the Soviet Union threatened to additionally fragment the sovereign states that emerged from the Soviet Union.



Additionally on rt.com
Ukraine’s Zelensky slams Russia’s Putin for claiming each nations ‘are one individuals’… regardless of as soon as saying the identical factor himself


It shouldn’t be a controversial argument that the previous Soviet republics should not conventional Westphalian states and have a mutual curiosity to seek out methods to cooperate throughout state borders. But, translated into rampant Russophobia, Putin desires to revive the Soviet Union and NATO should step as much as this new battle between liberal democracies and authoritarians.

At a summit in April 2008, NATO promised Ukraine future membership of the bloc in an effort to supposedly shield it from Russia, although solely 17% of Ukrainians backed such a transfer on the time. Whereas the West believed this may bolster Ukrainian sovereignty, it as a substitute set in place the destruction of the nation’s independence, as Kiev couldn’t keep cohesion and assist for such an anti-Russian venture.

Putin cautioned then-President George W. Bush that trying to utterly divorce Ukraine from Moscow would ultimately undo its statehood, which can also be ceaselessly cited as proof of Russian imperialism.

Spheres of curiosity

Within the aftermath of the struggle in Georgia in August 2008, then-President Dmitry Medvedev outlined the precept of Russian “spheres of curiosity” to keep away from comparable conflicts sooner or later. Whereas spheres of affect, typically used as a time period by political scientists, imply {that a} nation is beneath the unique sway of one other, spheres of curiosity is a nonexclusive idea that merely calls for that different international locations acknowledge the complicated relations at play.

The precept requires the necessity for actual multilateralism to incorporate the fact of Russia’s centuries of widespread historical past that produced deep socio-economic and civilizational ties. Ignoring the spheres of curiosity within the effort of changing Russia’s neighbours into anti-Russian bulwarks of NATO will predictably create inner chaos in these states and compel Moscow to reply.



Additionally on rt.com
Regardless of thousands and thousands of {dollars} & NATO/EU guarantees, Western powers are discovering out that Georgia is a tough place to play politics


In 2014, the same and predictable disaster developed in Ukraine. The EU introduced Kiev with a civilizational alternative between the West and Russia within the type of an Affiliation Settlement in late 2013, and supported riots in opposition to President Yanukovich when he didn’t make the ‘European alternative’.

Earlier than the Maidan, Kiev and Moscow proposed a trilateral EU-Ukraine-Russia settlement to resolve the underlying downside – Ukraine can’t stay a sovereign state and shall be torn aside if it should select between Russia and the West.

Merely put, Russia didn’t demand “spheres of affect” as unique affect, however acknowledged that such spheres exist, and that disregarding them would drive a wedge between Russians and Ukrainians. Predictably, Brussels rejected any trilateral answer, as all Russian civilizational connections with Ukraine had been scorned as imperial remnants obstructing democracy and European integration – with no meant irony.

Is Ukrainian sovereignty anti-Russian?

In his current article, Putin wrote that, “I’m assured that true sovereignty of Ukraine is feasible solely in partnership with Russia.” This was but once more interpreted as nothing lower than a Russian veto of Ukrainian statehood. Nevertheless, if we lower by the same old anti-Russian narratives, is that this argument not self-evident? Can Ukraine stay a sovereign state as a NATO frontline in opposition to Russia? Is it not already tearing itself in two?

Recognising the widespread historical past of the 2 international locations is important for rational politics. Putin has argued Russia and Ukraine have a shared origin and have “religious, human and civilizational ties shaped for hundreds of years.”

That widespread floor doesn’t imply it have to be a part of a shared state dominated by Moscow – any greater than it does for, say, Belarus. Nevertheless, it does make it not possible for Ukraine to develop as an ‘anti-Russia’ venture. Putin accurately famous that the brand new authorities in Kiev search to denounce and criminalize all features of the shared Soviet historical past, aside from staking a declare to massive historic Russian territories that had been transferred to Ukraine. This mass of contradictions, Putin believes – as do many Ukrainians themselves – dangers unravelling the nation altogether.

Like this story? Share it with a pal!

The statements, views and opinions expressed on this column are solely these of the creator and don’t essentially signify these of RT.

Leave a comment