How to demonize a refugee: Western media is proving it only cares about desperate people if they serve the right political purpose

Tips on how to demonize a refugee: Western media is proving it solely cares about determined folks in the event that they serve the proper political objective

Post by


The Guardian, the mouthpiece of Britain’s well-meaning, mildly left-of-center mainstream media, has printed a bit on refugees. Or, no less than, it ought to be about refugees. As an alternative, it’s about governments, not determined folks.

The governments of Lithuania, Latvia, and Poland, and behind them, the European Union, are feeling stress from Belarus, which they declare has been pushing refugees throughout the border, flown in from the Center East for the aim. Ostensibly, such a coverage is in retaliation for Western sanctions, as Minsk’s authoritarian chief Alexander Lukashenko has in impact already admitted

In The Guardian piece, the refugees should not harmless human beings fleeing for his or her lives. Quite the opposite, they aren’t even folks in any respect, having been completely decreased to numbers – aside from one non-descript image that appeared to serve solely ornamental functions. I, for one, was, actually, rubbing my eyes: right here it was, an extended textual content about sons, daughters, brothers and moms in misery – and never one sentence giving them a reputation or a voice. Not possible. But true. Whether or not the work of authors or editors, the impact was drastically revealing if, definitely, unintended.

As a result of when learn fastidiously, the article is such a textbook-grade illustration of the basic strategy of dehumanization that I’m considering of assigning it to my college students for instance – a nasty one. Lowering the illustration of a person or group to a set of numbers, it makes folks seem as if they’re inanimate objects. In that disadvantaged form, they will nonetheless be an issue for somebody – right here geopolitically pleasant governments with whose travails The Guardian clearly invitations us to sympathize. Or they are often a chance, on this case, Belarus’ management, which is deservedly the villain of the piece.



Additionally on rt.com
Regime change efforts in Belarus have entered a stalemate. However Russia is likely to be working in direction of an ‘Armenian resolution’ for Minsk


However to show these factors, the refugees are robbed of their humanity. They don’t seem to be requested about their expertise, quoted, or given particular names and fates. In brief, they don’t appear as if the remainder of us who write, learn, or even perhaps make insurance policies about them. We, after all, matter. They’re statistics – and threatening ones, in addition – no extra.

That is hanging, particularly coming from a newspaper that positions itself as humane and progressive. We are able to solely guess how this fiasco might occur. My wager could be that the authors and editors accountable didn’t act intentionally. They simply did not mirror and, as an alternative, adopted their unconscious biases. Whereas that, amongst considering adults, isn’t any excuse, it makes the article all of the extra fascinating as a symptom of a bigger phenomenon.

And a bigger phenomenon it’s. For those who scan information protection of this difficulty, you can see the identical sample repeatedly: Henry Foy of The Monetary Occasions finds loads of house for Ylva Johansson, the European commissioner for Dwelling Affairs, to take a position that Lukashenko’s actions are indicators of despair. The identical article additionally dwells intimately on Lithuania’s and Latvia’s difficulties and notes, perhaps with aid, that the EU has already succeeded in pressuring Iraq into stopping some flights, thus, in impact shutting that door to many potential refugees. But, as soon as once more, not a single refugee has a reputation or a voice.

The Washington Put up accurately reviews that Lukashenko is utilizing the refugees as “pawns.” It additionally refers back to the case of a refugee who allegedly died on the border underneath unclear, if in all probability violent, circumstances. Recognized – a reputation ultimately! – as Jafar Hussein Yusuf Al-Haris, 39, his loss of life has develop into the item of propaganda: Belarus accuses Lithuania, Lithuania and buddies reply by merely dismissing all of it as an data struggle.



Additionally on rt.com
EU hopes suspension of Baghdad-Minsk flights will stem migrant circulate to Lithuania as Vilnius debates large border fence


What’s disturbing about The Washington Put up’s take is that this story a couple of loss of life, presumably a killing, is decreased to a Brussels-Belarus he stated/she stated, with a bias, after all, towards the Western aspect. No effort is seen to analyze Al-Haris’s alleged destiny independently from the events. It’s given that means, right here, solely insofar because it impacts a contest between Belarus, the West’s foe, and Lithuania, its pal.

Al Jazeera, too, provides an article that’s solely concerning the considerably hysterical sense of risk, gloom, and doom that governments contained in the EU declare to expertise. Once more, the refugees are numbers and nothing extra. What readers do be taught intimately is that Poland and Lithuania consider that they’re the victims of, you guessed it, yet one more type of “weaponization.” Slovenia, at the moment holding the EU presidency, feels referred to as upon to weigh in with comparable foolish hyperbole a couple of “critical risk” to the entire EU. Poor Brussels, if a stream of individuals fleeing the Center East is absolutely all it takes… And we examine pressing conferences of ministers and companies, all to handle this “disaster.” If it wasn’t all fairly immoral, the phrase ‘ethical panic’ would come to thoughts.

Thankfully, there are small exceptions to this sample of dehumanization: Reuters, for example, in a bit reporting a merciless Latvian pushback operation, famous that its victims included “ladies and youngsters” and quoted a younger man by identify. Even Valerie Hopkins of The New York Occasions has no less than proven that even an article specializing in the geopolitics of this example can nonetheless additionally give the refugees no less than some voices and names.

What these exceptions show, after all, is that it’s doable, in truth simple to do higher than, for example, The Guardian. All it takes is preserving your wits collectively professionally and ethically, and specializing in the folks worst affected by the politics.



Additionally on rt.com
On migrants, it’s one hypocritical EU rule for Lithuania and one other for bogeyman Viktor Orban


There are two closing ironies on this unhappy image: first, there’s one other class of refugee coming, not via, however from Belarus that no one would dream of pushing again or decreasing to a mere and unwelcome statistic. These opposing Lukashenko are handled with the priority and care that they deserve. Some, like former presidential candidate Svetlana Tikhanovskaya, are even lauded within the West. The perceived distinction between these fleeing the nation and people fleeing by way of the nation is perverse, particularly for those who observe the truth that they have an inclination to have darker skins and non-European names.

Second, with Iraqis and Afghans among the many victims of each Lukashenko and the EU’s migration insurance policies, we’re additionally coping with human beings leaving nations devastated by Western interventions. But in the event that they occur to cross via Lukashenko’s Belarus, all we will see from the protection is his aggression. Our contribution to their destiny appears to not curiosity us anymore. And enjoying phrase video games by labeling them ‘migrants’ as an alternative of refugees solely reveals extra hypocrisy.

Johansson is, after all, proper that “utilizing human beings” is “the worst.” However she is lifeless flawed, morally flawed when she, in impact, diminishes the truth that even human beings who’re getting used, right here by Lukashenko, stay full human beings. In actual fact, they needn’t much less however extra care and safety exactly as a result of they’re getting used.

But, as an alternative of noting this apparent truth, Johansson has nothing higher to do than to attract an absurd however handy line: for her, actual refugees in want of assist are one way or the other, she has determined, “one thing completely completely different from Lukashenko utilizing people who find themselves in all probability not refugees.” Sadly, she fails to tell us how she feels she is aware of that these victims are doubtless to not be refugees, by her requirements. A wonderfully unsupported advert hoc assertion, crying out for a problem, The Monetary Occasions’s truth checker simply lets it stand, too.

Right here is the take-away level many within the West might not wish to face. Sure, what Lukashenko is doing, particularly utilizing human beings to systematically embarrass different governments, is extremely flawed. However the true purpose why it’s so flawed isn’t as a result of the governments is likely to be embarrassed, however due to the way it makes use of human beings within the first place. They’re those badly abused right here. And so they deserve sympathy, care, and safety. For those who write, learn, and even take into consideration this example, then the folks on the coronary heart of it deserve, at the least, names and voices. That’s human empathy.

When you concentrate on them, as you will have an ethical obligation to do, additionally, you will see that any response that treats or depicts them merely or largely as ‘devices’ or ‘weapons’ in an assault on ‘us’ within the ‘West’ is as morally decrepit, actually, because the act of sending them to exert stress within the first place.

For those who, rightly, condemn Lukashenko for utilizing them as mere objects, you have to additionally condemn your self for treating them merely as his objects. You and Lukashenko are on this collectively. Besides you break the sample of risk and protection and refocus on the struggling of these getting used.

Immanuel Kant, the principled German thinker from Kaliningrad, now Russia’s Baltic Sea exclave, had a useful line on this. No person, he argued, ought to ever be decreased to a mere means to an finish for the needs of others. He wasn’t simply speaking about rogue Belarusian presidents.

Suppose your mates would have an interest? Share this story!

The statements, views and opinions expressed on this column are solely these of the creator and don’t essentially signify these of RT.

Leave a comment